<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Nangate 45nm Open Cell Library supports OpenSPARC</title>
		<description>Comments for Nangate 45nm Open Cell Library supports OpenSPARC at http://www.opensparc.net , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.opensparc.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:14:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Thank you</title>
			<link>http://www.opensparc.net/whats-new/front-page/nangate-45nm-open-cell-library-supports-opensparc.html#comment-256</link>
			<description>Thank you very much for this information. Good post thanks for sharing. I like this site. - Tomas</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 21:12:05 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.opensparc.net/whats-new/front-page/nangate-45nm-open-cell-library-supports-opensparc.html#comment-154</link>
			<description>Of the standard cell libraries we have tried (from 3-4 different vendors), there hasn't been any issue of incompatibility. Gates, flops, muxes etc that OpenSPARC design uses are usually available in the library we have tried. However, it is conceivable that some library may not have all the structural elements that OpenSPARC design uses. There could also be name mismatches, for e.g. dff in OpenSPARC is scanable, but library may have dff as standard flop. It is always better to run equivalency on the resultant netlist against the original RTL to make sure library is truly compatible. - Durgam Vahia</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:59:37 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Compatible?</title>
			<link>http://www.opensparc.net/whats-new/front-page/nangate-45nm-open-cell-library-supports-opensparc.html#comment-148</link>
			<description>This might be a simple question, but is there a standard cell library that would _not_ be compatible with OpenSPARC?
 - John McBeardason</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:01:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

